The scientific community has long appreciated the importance of in vivo tumor models for understanding cancer biology and testing therapeutic strategies. Two popular methods for tumor implantation in these models are orthotopic and subcutaneous implantation. Both have their advantages, and the choice often depends on the specific goals of a study. In this post, we'll delve deep into the benefits of each method to guide researchers in their decision-making process.
October 24, 2023
- Advancing Bone and Sarcoma Cancer Research Through Robust In Vivo Models
- How the FDA’s Plausible Mechanism Framework Signals the Future of Precision Oncology
- What Makes Radioligand Therapy IND Strategy Fundamentally Different?
- Receptor Mediated Therapies in the Clinic: From Targeting to Impact
- A Translational Lens on Synergistic Cancer Therapy: Insights from Our Recent Case Study
Advancing Bone and Sarcoma Cancer Research Through Robust In Vivo Models
Bone cancers and soft tissue sarcomas represent a diverse group of rare malignancies arising from mesenchymal tissues including bone, muscle, fat, ...
How the FDA’s Plausible Mechanism Framework Signals the Future of Precision Oncology
The FDA’s newly announced Plausible Mechanism Framework marks an important step toward aligning regulatory pathways with the realities of modern ...
What Makes Radioligand Therapy IND Strategy Fundamentally Different?
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Get Started
Contact Us Today!
If you’re looking for an expert team to guide your trial with efficiency in mind, we can help. As the creators of the Dynamic Trial, TD2 provides start-to-finish support with trial strategy, design and execution for faster go-to-market potential.
