Orthotopic vs. Subcutaneous: Unpacking the Strengths and Limitations of Tumor Model Implantation Sites

October 24, 2023

Orthotopic vs. Subcutaneous: Unpacking the Strengths and Limitations of Tumor Model Implantation Sites

The scientific community has long appreciated the importance of in vivo tumor models for understanding cancer biology and testing therapeutic strategies. Two popular methods for tumor implantation in these models are orthotopic and subcutaneous implantation. Both have their advantages, and the choice often depends on the specific goals of a study. In this post, we'll delve deep into the benefits of each method to guide researchers in their decision-making process.

A Translational Lens on Synergistic Cancer Therapy: Insights from Our Recent Case Study

In cancer drug development, monotherapies often lose ground when tumors adapt. This is especially true for KRASmutant non–small cell lung cancers ...

Read more +

Redesigning Preclinical Oncology: A Framework for Improving Clinical Translatability with AI, RECIST-Inspired Metrics, and Systems-Level Thinking

Despite decades of investment in oncology drug development, the translational pipeline from preclinical models to clinical success remains ...

Read more +

Radiopharmaceutical Dosing Under FDA’s New Spotlight: What You Should Know

The FDA has issued a new draft guidance titled “Oncology Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals: Dosage Optimization During Clinical Development.” This ...

Read more +

Get Started

Contact Us Today!

If you’re looking for an expert team to guide your trial with efficiency in mind, we can help. As the creators of the Dynamic Trial, TD2 provides start-to-finish support with trial strategy, design and execution for faster go-to-market potential.